Showing posts with label law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label law. Show all posts

Saturday, 30 May 2015

Educational short film on need for comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation in Armenia

This great educational short film (in Armenian), with the use of nice graphics and pics,  illustrates various types of discrimination, so widespread in Armenia, and why it is essential to have a comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation, including discrimination based on sexual orientation.


Մեկ հասարակություն ՝ մեկ իրավունք from EPF Armenia on Vimeo.

Wednesday, 25 March 2015

EU sees "limited" human rights progress in Armenia and calls authorities to adopt LGBT inclusive anti-discrimination legislation

In an annual report to assess the implementation of whatever remained from the European Neighbourhood Policy in Armenia, EU noted "no tangible developments in the implementation and enforcement of legislation on human rights and fundamental freedoms", and overall "limited progress on deep and sustainable democracy, human rights and fundamental freedoms".

Among its recommendations, EU calls Armenia authorities to adopt and implement a "comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation":
  • adopting and implementing a comprehensive anti-discrimination law; implementing and monitoring implementation of the law on equal rights and equal opportunities for women and men, including taking further steps towards harmonising legislation in this area with the EU acquis; adopting the law on domestic violence
EU report states: "Armenia still does not have a comprehensive legal framework against discrimination. The human rights action plan only suggested assessing the compatibility of relevant Armenian legislation with international law and weighing the merits of adopting an anti-discrimination law. No measures were put in place to protect the rights of LGBTI people, while discrimination and hostility continued to be a major problem. There was also widespread discrimination against people with disabilities with regard to their economic, social and cultural rights. People with disabilities were also socially segregated in all areas." [emphasis mine]

Full report is available here.

Sunday, 21 December 2014

Positive representation of gay people on Russian TV - Физика или Химия

Browsing YouTube, I accidentally came across this Russian TV series Физика или Химия [Physics or Chemistry]. It’s a Russian adaptation of original Spanish TV series Física o Química.

I watched only one episode - therefore I cannot reflect the whole series - but was struck by positive, away from cliché, representation of gay people on Russian TV. So many aspects of it were done so good, including the choice of characters, relationships with friends, coming out, parents’ reaction...



This could have been a textbook example of how media should portray LGBT people, especially in countries where homophobia is very high and there is big gap and lack in education on matters of sexuality and gender identity. And what is even more important, that the series are based in a high school setting in Moscow, raising important youth relevant issues.

Unfortunately, there was only 1 season produced and shown on Russian CTC TV channel in 2011, and, of course, considering the subsequent developments in Russia, where homophobia elevated to the state level by the so called gay propaganda laws and other examples of intolerance, you will unlikely to see anything similar in the near future.

It's a big shame that country with such a great intellectual and cultural potential to champion diversity, equality, acceptance within post-Soviet space and beyond, instead turned into an epitome of intolerance and homophobia.

Wednesday, 2 April 2014

Georgia PM’s EU trick: ‘OK for LGBT inclusive anti-discrimination bill, but only if we discriminate more, constitutionally’

Georgia's PM offers setting constitutional ban on same-sex marriage as a trade-off for passing LGBT inclusive anti-discrimination bill. Basically, on one hand, the authorities in Tbilisi are showing-off with anti-discrimination bill to tick all the EU check boxes, on the other hand, in practice, constitutionally reinforcing the very discrimination they (supposedly) committed to tackle.
In parallel to endorsing an anti-discrimination bill, which will now be submitted to Parliament for confirmation, the Georgian government has also proposed to define marriage in the constitution as a “union of man and woman.” The proposal, as PM Irakli Garibashvili put it, aims at avoiding “speculation” over the planned anti-discrimination legislation, which will provide protection against discrimination on the ground of, among others, sexual orientation. Adoption of this legislation is among requirements set in Georgia’s Visa Liberalisation Action Plan with the EU. Article 36 of the Georgian constitution currently reads: “Marriage shall be based upon equality of rights and free will of spouses.” Same-sex marriage is already banned in Georgia’s civil code, which defines marriage as “voluntary union of man and woman.”
For the European Union to accept the proposed ‘solution’ would make a mockery of the very idea of anti-discrimination legislation they are trying to enforce. This would be a dangerous precedent, indeed. What is a point of anti-discrimination bill if as a result of its approval you are getting discrimination constitutionally reinforced?! I’d say better not have such legislation at all.

If Georgia is not ready yet to move closer towards the EU, then it's not ready. The EU should never agree with such artificial and unacceptable trade-off, which is nothing less than throwing dust in the eyes.

As Georgian gay rights group Identoba noted, the country is on a “dangerous path” with proposed homophobic amendment in the constitution.
[…] Campaigning on  xenophobic and recently, on homophobic grounds has been a strategy of choice for most political players in the country, since it gained independence in the 1990s. The initiative came as  shock to many, since the issue of same-sex marriage has never come to the agenda of LGBT movement in Georgia which has struggled to exercise basic rights to security and protection. In 2012 and in 2013, under UNM and GD parties being in power, respectively, Georgia has consistently failed to ensure the freedom of assembly for Georgian LGBT activists. Georgia has not been able to persecute a single person for the horrific attacks against LGBT activists and supporters on  May 17th, IDAHO day. Therefore, constitutionally banning the prospect of marriage equality, already banned by Georgia’s Civil Code, can only be seen as a homophobic move. It further deteriorates already feeble state of LGBT human rights in Georgia. If the amendment is successfully initiated, it will directly violate universal equality of single parents, LGBT community and many others who do not live nuclear families. Alarmingly, this homophobic and cynical move ultimately kills the very spirit of equality protection of incoming Anti-Discrimination Law. 
Identoba, Georgia’s largest LGBT and gender equality protection NGO calls on all parties to speak up against proposed changes in Georgia’s Constitution.

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

Prominent Armenians issue statement in support of LGBT human rights (in English and Armenian)

More than two-dozen prominent Armenians in the Diaspora have signed a statement supporting equality and justice for all in Armenia. Among the signatories are poet Diana Der Hovanessian,
filmmaker Atom Egoyan, actor and producer Arsinée Khanjian, musician Serj Tankian, and photographer Scout Tufankjian. This array of Armenian artists, intellectuals and professionals felt moved to release this statement in the light of anti-gay legislation that was recently proposed in Yerevan. “This anti-gay legislation is part of a disturbing pattern of intolerance for marginalized people and opposition voices in Armenia,” said publisher Veken Gueyikian. Writer Nancy Agabian said, “People of conscience must not stand by as our LGBT cousins are targeted and demonized.” The statement represents their collective commitment to human rights and to Armenia’s nascent civil society movements.

For more background see:

Armenian Gay and Lesbian Alliance Statement Against Armenian Police Proposal http://aglany.org/2013/10/28/statement-against-armenian-police-proposal/

Amnesty Documents Widespread harassment of Armenia’s LGBT Community http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2013/08/22/amnesty-documents-widespread-harassment-of-armenias-lgbt-community/

Human Rights Watch Letter to Armenian President Regarding Proposed Anti-LGBT Legislation http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/10/18/letter-armenian-president-regarding-proposal-anti-lgbt-legislation

Statement

“In response to reports of draft ‘anti-propaganda’ legislation in Armenia, modeled on Russia’s recently passed and widely condemned bill, we, the undersigned members of the global Armenian community, say such attempts to codify anti-gay prejudice into law are contrary to our values. We believe in dignity, equality and the right to self-expression for all people regardless of religion, sexual orientation, gender, or race.”

Nancy Agabian
Mika Artyan
Arlene Avakian
Peter Balakian
Anthony Barsamian
David Barsamian
Eve Beglarian
Chris Bohjalian
Melissa Boyajian
Diana Der Hovanessian
Atom Egoyan
Dahlia Elsayed
Houry Geudelekian
Veken Gueyikian
Nonny Hogrogian
Aris Janigian
Nina Katchadourian
Nishan Kazazian
Arsinee Khanjian
David Kherdian
Nancy Kricorian
Micheline Aharonian Marcom
Neery Melkonian
Arthur Nersesian
Joan Aghajanian Quinn
Aram Saroyan
Serj Tankian
Scout Tufankjian
Hrag Vartanian
***
[in Armenian - below]

Սփյուռքի ավելի քան երկու տասնյակ նշանավոր հայեր միացել են Հայաստանում` բոլորի համար հավասարության և արդարության ապահովման մասին հայտարարությանը: Նրանց թվում են բանաստեղծ Դիանա Տեր-Հովանեսյանը, կինոռեժիսոր Ատոմ Էգոյանը, դերասան և պրոդյուսեր Արսինե Խանջյանը, երաժիշտ Սերժ Թանկյանը, և լուսանկարիչ Սկաուտ Թուֆանկջյանը: Հայ արտիստների, մտավորականների ու մասնագետների այս խումբը անհարժեշտ համարեցին հրապարակել այս հայտարարությունը` հաշվի առնելով նույնասեռականության դեմ օրինագիծը, որը վերջերս առաջարկվել էր Երեւանում: «Նույնասեռականության դեմ այս օրինագիծը Հայաստանում խոցելի մարդկանց և ընդդիմադիր ձայների նկատմամբ անհանդուրժողականության մտահոգիչ օրինակ է»,- ասել է հրատարակիչ Վիգեն Գվիկյանը: Գրող Նենսի Ագաբյանն ասել է. «Մտահոգ մարդիկ չպետք է անտարբեր մնան, երբ ԼԳԲՏ մեր բարեկամները թիրախավորվում և պիտակավորվում են»: Հայտարարությունը ներկայացնում է նրանց միահամուռ նվիրվածությունը մարդու իրավունքներին և Հայաստանի քաղաքացիական հասարակության ծնունդ առնող շարժումներին:

Այլ մանրամասների համար կարդացեք նաև.

ԱԳԼԱ Նյու-Յորքի հայտարարությունն ընդդեմ «քարոզչության» օրենքի ներկայացմանը http://aglany.org/2013/10/28/statement-against-armenian-police-proposal/

Ամնեսթին փաստագրել է համատարած բռնություն Հայաստանում ԼԳԲՏ անձանց նկատմամբ (անգլերեն)
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2013/08/22/amnesty-documents-widespread-harassment-of-armenias-lgbt-community/

Հյուման Ռայթս Վոթչի նամակը ՀՀ Նախագահին` նույնասեռականության դեմ ներկայացված օրինագծի վերաբերյալ (անգլերեն)
http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/10/18/letter-armenian-president-regarding-proposal-anti-lgbt-legislation

Հայտարարություն

Ի պատասխան Հայաստանում շրջանառված «հակաքարոզչական» օրենսդրության նախագծի` ձևավորված Ռուսաստանում վերջերս ընդունված և լայնորեն դատապարտված օրինագծի օրինակով, մենք, համընդհանուր հայկական համայնքի ներքոստորագրյալ ներկայացուցիչներս, համոզված ենք, որ նույնասեռականության դեմ նախապաշարմունքների օրենսդրորեն ամրագրման փորձերը հակասում են մեր արժեքներին: Մենք հավատում ենք, որ արժանապատվությունը, հավասարությունը և ինքնարտահայտման իրավունքը բոլորի համար են` անկախ կրոնից, սեռական կողմնորոշումից, գենդերից կամ ռասայից:

Նենսի Ագաբյան
Միկա Արթյան
Առլեն Ավագյան
Պիտեր Բալակյան
Անտոնի Բարսամյան
Դեյվիդ Բարսամյան
Եվա Բեգլարյան
Քրիս Բոհջալյան
Մելիսա Բոյաջյան
Դիանա Տեր-Հովանեսյան
Ատոմ Էգոյան
Դահիլա Էլսայեդ
Հուրի Գյուդելեքյան
Վիգեն Գվիկյան
Նոնի Հոգրոգյան
Արիս Ջանիգյան
Նինա Խաչադուրյան
Նիշան Կազազյան
Արսինե Խանջյան
Դավիդ Խերդյան
Նենսի Գրիգորյան
Միշելին Ահարոնյան Մարկոմ
Նիրի Մելքոնյան
Արթուր Ներսեսյան
Ջոան Աղաջանյան Քուին
Արամ Սարոյան
Սերժ Թանկյան
Սկաուտ Թուֆանկջյան
Հրագ Վարդանյան

*picture - via PINK Armenia

Monday, 28 October 2013

NYC-based Armenian gay rights group (AGLA NY) statement against attempts at introducing in Armenia Russia-like 'propaganda' law

Read also:

Testing grounds: anti-gay ‘propaganda’ bill proposed, then swiftly withdrawn in Armenia

Human Rights Watch letter to Armenia president regarding proposal for anti-LGBT legislation


*source AGLA NY

STATEMENT

The Armenian Gay and Lesbian Association of New York is alarmed that in August 2013 the Armenian police proposed a ban on “promoting non-traditional sexual relationships”, which would effectively target LGBT people in Armenia with prejudice. We call for the President, Prime Minister, and Parliament to strike down any further attempts to legislate discrimination against LGBT Armenians.

After the DIY bar bombing and attack on a cultural diversity march in Yerevan in May of 2012, it was clear that intervention was needed to guarantee human rights. But little has been done. Some LGBT Armenians, productive members of society, have been forced to leave Armenia after the events of last May in order to escape threats to their lives. The DIY firebombers have been sentenced with little more than a slap on the wrist. Recent violent threats against organizations that work for gender equality indicate the need for more protection, not persecution.

The police proposed Article 47.7 to the Administrative Violations Code, which threatened the civil rights of LGBT people and any individual or organization who would discuss LGBT issues in public. Though the bill was withdrawn, it seems it was only because it was poorly drafted, suggesting the motivation was merely an expression by the police of prejudice. The fact that the wording of the bill echoes legislation in Russia is even more disturbing, given the levels of violence waged against LGBT people there since its passage. Now that Armenia has signed on to a Customs Union with Russia, it seems the situation is dire, and that continuing emulation of Russian laws will follow.

AGLA NY and members of the Diaspora have been watching signs of human rights violations in Armenia with growing concern. We now ask the government to follow its own constitution in guaranteeing the rights of all its citizens by taking a stand against any future attempts to legislate against LGBT people.
***
[in Armenian]

Նյու-Յորքի հայ գեյերի եւ լեսբուհիների ասոցիացիան (ԱԳԼԱ Նյու-Յորք) մտահոգ է այն փաստով, որ 2013թ. օգոստոսին սկզբում Հայաստանի ոստիկանությունը արգելք առաջարկեց «ոչ ավանդական սեռական հարաբերությունների վերաբերյալ քարոզչության» համար, ինչն արդյունավետ կերպով նախապաշարմունքներով կթիրախավորեր Հայաստանում ԼԳԲՏ մարդկանց: Մենք կո ́չ ենք անում Նախագահին, Վարչապետին եւ ԱԺ- ին վերջ դնել ԼԳԲՏ հայերի նկատմամբ խտրականության օրինականացման ցանկացած այլ փորձի:

2012թ. մայիսին Երեւանում DIY բարի պայթեցումից եւ մշակութային բազմազանության երթի վրա հարձակումից հետո պարզ էր, որ մարդու իրավունքների երաշխավորման համար անհրաժեշտ էր միջամտություն: Բայց շատ քիչ բան արվեց: Մի քանի ԼԳԲՏ հայեր, հասարակության օգտակար անդամներ ստիպված եղան լքել Հայաստանը անցյալ մայիսին կատարված իրադարձություններից հետո` խուսափելու համար իրենց կյանքին սպառնալիքներից: DIY-ը պայթեցնողները դատապարտվեցին դաստակի ապտակից մի փոքր ծանր պատժով: Գենդերային հավասարության համար աշխատող կազմակերպությունների նկատմամբ վերջերս տեղի ունեցեղ բռնի սպառնալիքները ցույց են տալիս, որ կա ավելի շատ պաշտպանության, այլ ոչ թե հալածանքի կարիք:

Ոստիկանությունը Վարչական իրավախախտումների վերաբերյալ ՀՀ օրենսգրքում նախաձեռնել էր Հոդված 47.7-ը, ինչը սպառնում էր ԼԳԲՏ անձանց քաղաքացիական իրավունքներին եւ ցանկացած այլ անհատի կամ կազմակերպության, եթե նրանք հանրայնորեն քննարկեին ԼԳԲՏ խնդիրները: Թեեւ օրինագիծը հետ կանչվեց, թվում է, որ դա արվեց միայն այն պատճառով, որ շատ վատ էր մշակված եւ արտահայտում էր ոստիկանության նախապաշարմունքային դրդապատճառները: Այն փաստը, որ օրինագծի ձեւակերպումը Ռուսաստանի օրենսդրության ընդօրինակումն է, շատ ավելի մտահոգիչ է, հաշվի առնելով օրենքի ընդունումից հետո այնտեղ ԼԳԲՏ անձանց նկատմամբ կատարվող բռնության մակարդակը: Հիմա, քանի որ Հայաստանը ցանկություն է հայտնել միանալ Ռուսաստանի հետ Մաքսային Միությանը, թվում է, որ իրավիճակը սոսկալի է, եւ որ Ռուսաստանի օրենքների կրկնօրինակման գործընթացը կշարունակվի:

ԱԳԼԱ Նյու-Յորքը եւ սփյուռքի ժողովուրդը մտահոգությամբ նկատում են Հայաստանում աճող մարդու իրավունքների ոտնահարուման դեպքերը: Մենք հիմա խնդրում ենք Կառավարությանը հետեւել իր սեփական Սահմանադրությանը` երաշխավորելով իր բոլոր քաղաքացիների իրավունքները, միջոցներ ձեռնարկել ԼԳԲՏ անձանց դեմ ուղղված ցանկացած օրենքի ընդունման հետագա փորձի դեմ:

Saturday, 19 October 2013

Human Rights Watch letter to Armenia president regarding proposal for anti-LGBT legislation

Excellent. Right to the point. The letter by Human Rights Watch, dated 12 August 2013 (see pdf file), publicised yesterday.



For additional background info, read: Testing grounds: anti-gay ‘propaganda’ bill proposed, then swiftly withdrawn in Armenia

**

OCTOBER 18, 2013
Any measures to limit LGBT peoples’ freedom of expression and assembly on the basis of their sexual or gender identity would further reflect the Armenian government’s noncompliance with its obligations to promote tolerance towards LGBT people and protect them against discrimination. They could also possibly condone homophobia and transphobia, which contributes to a climate of hatred and violence.
Serzh Sargsyan
President
Republic of Armenia
26 Marshal Baghramian Avenue
0077 Yerevan, Republic of Armenia
Cc:
Tigran Sargsyan
Prime Minister
Republic of Armenia
Republic Square, Government House 1
0010 Yerevan, Republic of Armenia
Hovik Abrahamyan
Speaker of the Parliament
National Assembly of Armenia
19 Marshal Baghramian Avenue
0095 Yerevan, Republic of Armenia
Dear Mr. Sargsyan,
We are writing to express our concern regarding a proposal for legislative amendments that appeared on the website of the Police of the Republic of Armenia on August 5. The proposals sought to add two articles to the Code of Administrative Offenses outlawing the “propaganda of nontraditional sexual relations,” a move that would be in clear violation of freedom of expression and discriminate against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people.
The police have since removed the proposal from its website, and media reports indicate that there are no immediate plans for parliament to consider it. However, we are concerned that other institutions may seek to introduce similar proposals and ask that you ensure that such measures are forcefully opposed as incompatible with international human rights law and would not advance for parliamentary debate.
The proposal claimed the ban would “protect” Armenian families. It would impose fines of up to 350 times Armenia’s minimum wage on citizens, public officials, and legal entities who breach the law. The proposal did not define “propaganda” or “nontraditional sexual relations.”
The broad wording of the proposal meant that it could have been used to restrict the rights of human rights organizations, civil society groups, or anyone else who works on issues such as the rights of LGBT people or sex workers. It also would have discriminated against LGBT people on grounds of their sexual orientation and gender identity.
Armenian civil society organizations learned of the proposal only when it was published on the website of the Police of the Republic of Armenia.
Measures such as those proposed by the police are illegal under international human rights instruments that Armenia is obliged to uphold. They impose unjustified – and therefore unlawful – restrictions on the freedoms of expression and assembly, in violation of articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights and articles 19 and 21 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Armenia is a party to both. They also violate the international prohibition on discrimination, guaranteed by both instruments.
The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe has unanimously adopted a set of recommendations (CM/Rec (2010)5) to member states, including Armenia, on measures to combat discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity. The recommendations invite the member states to ensure that the stipulated principles and measures are applied in national legislation, policies, and practices relevant to the protection of LGBT people. Relevant recommendations are:
  1. Examine existing legislative and other measures, keep them under review, and collect and analyze relevant data, in order to monitor and redress any direct or indirect discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity;
  1. Ensure that legislative and other measures are adopted and effectively implemented to combat discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity, to ensure respect for the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender persons and to promote tolerance towards them.
Measures such as those in the proposal directly contradict the Council of Europe recommendations.
Civil society organizations in Armenia have expressed concern over the government’s failure to protect the social, economic and political rights of LGBT people. LGBT people continue to face discrimination in accessing employment and healthcare, as well as violence in the army and in families. The government has yet to pass a law banning hate crimes in Armenia, leaving LGBT people vulnerable to abuses such as the repeated homophobic attacks against the DIY pub during May 2012. A draft law currently under consideration by parliament outlawing discrimination on the grounds of sex, ethnicity, and age omits sexual orientation from its considerations.
Any measures to limit LGBT peoples’ freedom of expression and assembly on the basis of their sexual or gender identity would further reflect the Armenian government’s noncompliance with its obligations to promote tolerance towards LGBT people and protect them against discrimination. They could also possibly condone homophobia and transphobia, which contributes to a climate of hatred and violence.
We call on the Armenian government to support LGBT peoples’ human rights and take actions to curb the passage of any measures that violate the European Convention on Human Rights and other international instruments to which Armenia is party.
Sincerely,
Rachel Denber
Deputy Director
Europe and Central Asia Division

Tuesday, 13 August 2013

Testing grounds: anti-gay ‘propaganda’ bill proposed, then swiftly withdrawn in Armenia

Last week, a proposal by Armenia police in a form of amendments to the administrative offenses law was published on police.am website for “public consultations”. As per the amendments, hefty fines would be imposed on individuals, officials, organisations or media for “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations”.
«Հոդված 47.8. Ոչ ավանդական սեռական հարաբերությունների վերաբերյալ քարոզչությունը 1. Ոչ ավանդական սեռական հարաբերությունների վերաբերյալ քարոզչությունը` առաջացնում է տուգանքի նշանակում քաղաքացիների նկատմամբ` սահմանված նվազագույն աշխատավարձի հիսնապատիկից մինչև հարյուրապատիկի չափով, պաշտոնատար անձանց նկատմամբ` սահմանված նվազագույն աշխատավարձի հարյուրապատիկից մինչև հարյուրհիսնապատիկի չափով և իրավաբանական անձի պաշտոնատար անձանց նկատմամբ` սահմանված նվազագույն աշխատավարձի երկուհարյուրապատիկից մինչև երկուհարյուրհիսնապատիկի չափով: 2. Սույն հոդվածի առաջին մասով նախատեսված արարքը, որը կատարվել է զանգվածային լրատվության միջոցների օգտագործմամբ` առաջացնում է տուգանքի նշանակում քաղաքացիների նկատմամբ` սահմանված նվազագույն աշխատավարձի հարյուրապատիկից մինչև հարյուրհիսնապատիկի չափով, պաշտոնատար անձանց նկատմամբ` սահմանված նվազագույն աշխատավարձի հարյուրհիսնապատիկից մինչև երկուհարյուրապատիկի չափով և իրավաբանական անձի պաշտոնատար անձանց նկատմամբ` սահմանված նվազագույն աշխատավարձի երկուհարյուրհիսնապատիկից մինչև երեքհարյուրհիսնապատիկի չափով:»
This was effectively a copycat of the exact same wording in similar Russian law. The latter generated an international outrage and resulted in further deterioration of rights of LGBT people and overall human rights situation in Russia. [Amnesty International’s blog drew parallels between Russia and Armenia re homophobia & so called gay 'propaganda' bills.]

As the author and activist Nancy Kricorian tweeted, right to the point: "ARMENIA acting as Russia's "Mini-Me' in proposing gay "propaganda" ban".  

While technically proposed by police, to say that it's Armenia police draft proposal is to say nothing because everyone knows unless it’s sanctioned by Baghramyan 26 (presidential HQ), or at least one of its competing fractions, police wouldn't think of proposing anything.

I call this testing grounds. A blatant attempt by some Russia connected structures and individuals in Armenia to derail the association agreement with the EU.

Initial reaction to the proposal was predominantly negative full of ridiculing police and the draft law. Even people who you would not necessarily consider gay friendly made fun of the published provisions, and the main topic of discussions within the Armenian segment of Facebook was to define, often humorously, the term "non-traditional sexual relations".

Few further points I'd like to make. Since when Armenia police turned into a ‘morality police’? I mean particularly the published “motivation” for developing such bill, i.e. “protecting traditional family values” and so on. They cited one article of the Armenian Constitution that the basis of Armenian society is family, but there is nothing there to suggest “traditional family” in police interpretation.
“ՀՀ Սահմանադրության 35-րդ հոդվածի համաձայն` ընտանիքը հասարակության բնական և հիմնական բջիջն է: Պետությունն իր հերթին միջոցներ է ձեռնարկում ամուր ընտանիք կազմելուն նպաստելու, ընտանիքի համար բավարար կենսամակարդակի, այդ թվում՝ բնակարանի, ինչպես նաև իր քաղաքացիների կենսապայմանների բարելավման համար: Նորանկախ Հայաստանի Հանրապետության համար առավել քան արդիական է հայ ավանդական ընտանիքի մոդելի պահպանման խնդիրը, քանի որ հենց ավանդական բարոյական արժեքների վրա հիմնված ընտանիքն է հանդիսանում մեր ազգապահպանության հենասյունը: Ինտեգրվելով եվրոպական արժեքներին` մենք, կամա թե ակամա, դարձանք ոչ միայն ժողովրդավարության համամարդկային արժեքների կրողը, այլև միաժամանակ ընդունեցինք հայ ազգային մտածողությանը խորթ երևույթներ: Դրանցից մեկը ոչ ավանդական սեռական հարաբերություններն են, որոնք շատ ժամանակ խրախուսվում են հասարակության կողմից` առանց գիտակցելու տվյալ երևույթի արատավոր և կործանարար ազդեցությունը հայ ընտանիքի կազմավորման, ապագա սերունդների հոգեկերտվածքի ձևավորման, դաստիարակության և այլ հարցերում: Այս երևույթն առավել վտանգավոր է դառնում այն բոլոր դեպքերում, երբ ոչ միայն խրախուսվում է, այլև` քարոզվում: Քարոզչական տարբեր մեթոդների կիրառումը նպաստում է նրան, որ երևույթն ընկալվում է որպես գովազդ և սկսում է դիտարկվել ինչպես օրինաչափ և բնական յուրաքանչյուր երևույթ: Այնինչ, բացասական երևույթների նմանօրինակ եղանակներով հրապարակայնացումն ու քարոզչությունը չեն կարող խրախուսվել մի պետության կողմից, որը դարերն ի վեր գոյատևել է ավանդական արժեքների, կայուն ընտանիքի պահպանման շնորհիվ: Մեր պետության առջև ծառացած այս արատավոր երևույթը և դրա հետագա տարածումը կանխելու նպատակով` նախապատրաստվել է «Վարչական իրավախախտումների վերաբերյալ Հայաստանի Հանրապետության օրենսգրքում լրացումներ կատարելու մասին» ՀՀ օրենքի նախագիծը, որը վարչական պատասխանատվություն է նախատեսում ոչ ավանդական սեռական հարաբերությունների քարոզչության համար: Ընդ որում, օրինագիծն առավել խիստ պատասխանատվություն է նախատեսում ոչ ավանդական սեռական հարաբերությունները զանգվածային լրատվության միջոցների օգտագործմամբ քարոզելու դեպքում:” 
They also conveniently ‘forgot’ article 14.1 of the very Constitution they are supposedly basing their proposal on. Let’s then ditch the Constitution altogether and start living under “traditional” laws, whatever that means. And btw, I do not think it’s a police job to interpret the Constitution. Luckily, Armenia is not considered a police state... yet.

Within a matter of one day this draft bill already managed to hurt Armenia's image.  News gone viral internationally and immediate pressure exhorted to withdraw the draft bill from circulation.

The following day police chief withdrew the draft bill citing “shortcomings” and “no priority”.

08.08.2013 14:41 Օրինագիծը հետ է ուղարկվել
ՀՀ ոստիկանության  կայքէջի «Օրենսդրություն» խորագրի «Հանրային քննարկումներ» և «Նախագծեր»  ենթաբաժիններում զետեղվել էր  «Վարչական իրավախախտումների վերաբերյալ Հայաստանի Հանրապետության օրենսգրքում լրացումներ կատարելու մասին» ՀՀ օրենքի նախագիծը: Օրենքի նախագիծը մշակվել է ՀՀ ոստիկանության իրավաբանական վարչության կողմից` հիմք ընդունելով  մի քանի տասնյակ մտավորականների դիմում-բողոքները: Ոստիկանության պետ Վլադիմիր Գասպարյանը, նկատի ունենալով օրինագծի` քննարկումների ընթացքում  ի հայտ եկած  թերություններն ու բացթողումները, ինչպես և նշելով, որ այդ խնդիրն այսօր ոստիկանության առաջնահերթություններից չէ, օրինագիծը հետ է ուղարկել:

 
This is not the end of the story, however. I suspect attempts to introduce similar bills will continue, particularly via parliament. And if this happens, it will only be because ruling regime decided so. If you know the Armenian pyramid of power, you know that Baghramyan 26 controls the parliament and no such decision could be made without president’s ok.



As I tweeted earlier (here and here):

FYI Armenia: No country ever benefited from anti-gay 'propaganda' laws. It leads to more discussions & disastrous image consequences. Even Putin's Russia with its seemingly 'I can do whatever I want' attitude struggle to cope with international PR disaster following anti-gay laws. And this is how it should be and will be.


Monday, 29 July 2013

DIY firebombers court case: anti-gay attackers effectively pardoned in Armenia

UPDATE 23 October 2013: Amnesty Granted to Brothers Accused of Bombing Gay-Friendly Bar DIY (+ comments section below)
***
Here we are. DIY firebombers avoided imprisonment. They got conditional sentencing and a symbolic fine. Very mild court sentence for anti-gay attack in Armenia capital Yerevan.
«Պինցետ» փանք խմբի մենակատար Արմինե Օգանեզովայի (Ծոմակ) DIY բարը հրկիզած ազգայնական եղբայրներն այսօր դատապարտվել են 1 տարի 7 ամիս պայմանական ազատազրկման և 2 տարվա փորձաշրջանի: Այսօր Կենտրոն և Նորք Մարաշ վարչական շրջանների ընդհանուր իրավասության դատարանում Գագիկ Պողոսյանի նախագահությամբ կայացել է DIY բարի հրկիզման գործով արագացված դատավարությունը: Երևանի կենտրոնում՝ Փարպեցու փողոցում գտնվող DIY բարը նախորդ տարվա մայիսին մի քանի անգամ հարձակման էր ենթարկվել ազգայնական խմբավորման անդամների կողմից: Առաջին հարձակման ժամանակ իրանահայ եղբայրներ Արամեհ և Համբիկ Խաբազյանները պայթեցրել էին ակումբը` կոտրելով ապակին և բենզինով շիշը ներս նետելով, որից հետո ձերբակալվել էին: Ակումբին հասցվել էր 3.227.563 դրամի գույքային վնաս: Եղբայրներից մեկին ազատել էին ստորագրության դիմաց, մյուսի համար մեկ միլիոն դրամ գրավ էր վճարվել, իսկ նրա երաշխավորներն էին ՀՅԴ-ական պատգամավորներ Արծվիկ Մինասյանն ու Հրայր Կարապետյանը: [Epress.am]
They were merely charged under the Article 185 Part 3 of the Criminal Code with the intentional infliction of damage to property committed by arson, explosion or other publicly dangerous method. Not even aggravating circumstances. Not to mention that this was a classical example of hate crime. Crime that is still awaiting its definition in the Armenian criminal code.

 Now you know it's ok to attack gays, gay-friendly venues in Armenia. Maximum you will get is a conditional sentence and a symbolic fine. And, yes, don't forget asking MPs for support. Satisfaction guaranteed.

Very few in Armenia and Diaspora cared about this sentence or the court hearing. No much publicity or condemnations.

Many will think: ah, it doesn't concern me. Or worse: that they should have been formally pardoned or perhaps considered as heroes.

It’s exactly because of such mentality that the situation in Armenia is not moving forward. This is what I was referring to in my post that we fight against consequences rather than root cause of the problem(s).
@nkayserian How can I be happy or think of anything else when I know DIY firebombers are not sitting in jail for anti #gay attack. #Injustice #Armenia 
For now, I can sum-up that anti-gay attackers were effectively pardoned in Armenia. Congrats to ARF Dashnaktsutyun & ruling Republican party MPs for a victory of hate crime.

 

Wednesday, 17 July 2013

England follows France in celebrating equality and making gay marriage a reality. Congratulations!!

Here we are. Gay marriage became law in England and Wales. Scotland to follow soon with a separate legislation.

Congrats to British citizens and activists who made equal marriage a reality.

British PM David Cameron personally contributed to the cause by proposing the legislation in the first place. I do not support Tories, but here is what PM tweeted today:

@David_Cameron: After a long parliamentary process gay marriage became law tonight - something I believe we can be proud of as a country. 

Respects!!

The other day, a symbol of Paris - Eiffel tower turned rainbow for the occasion of French National Day - Bastille day. Liberté, égalité, fraternité ["Liberty, equality, fraternity (brotherhood)].

Ironically, some local Armenian and Russian homophobes decided to show solidarity with French homophobes (against passing of gay marriage law in France) on... Bastille Day. They have no idea what this day is all about. This is how out of touch with contemporary (and historic) realities these people are. This is how irrelevant they became.

 

Back to the main topic of this blog post.

Now that gay marriage became a reality in Britain, I should reclaim my traditional Armenian roots and start looking for husband ;))

And talking about traditions.

“Belgium used to belong to the countries in Europe with a very conservative attitude towards gays until the mid-1990s and then became one of the most progressive countries regarding gay rights within only 10 years.” [source]

FYI Armenia.

P.S. I devote this post to very dear friends of mine who got married recently. They know who they are. x

Friday, 17 May 2013

Armenia - at the bottom of Europe re human rights protection of its LGBT citizens

Ahead of the International Day Against Homophobia (IDAHO), leading European gay rights group ILGA-Europe launched its Rainbow Europe package reviewing the human rights situation and assessing what life is like for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex (LGBTI) people in Europe in 2013.

According to the Rainbow map and accompanied score sheet, countries have been assigned scores based on the level of legal human rights protection for LGBT people.
The Rainbow Map covers the legal and policy situation with regards to 6 thematic categories (Equality and non-discrimination; Family; Bias motivated speech / violence; Legal gender recognition; Freedom of assembly, association, and expression; and Asylum). The main rule is that sexual orientation and gender identity (or equivalent) need to be clearly referred to in the respective law or policy; or that lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex people are treated equally in law or by the state. For the purposes of this map, a law or policy is taken to exist once it is adopted by the respective parliament. 
Published also a comprehensive qualitative annual review report containing separate chapters on each country that gives more detailed background about the situation.

Only 3 countries among 49 European countries have a one-digit score: Russia (the lowest 49th place with 7%), Armenia (48th place with 8%) and Azerbaijan (47th place with 8%). 

Shameful.

And with such credentials, Armenia assumed today chairmanship of the Council of Europe for six months.

[below is Armenia Score Sheet in English and Armenian]


Tuesday, 14 May 2013

#nohate Roundtable discussion on hate culture in Armenia 1 year on following DIY firebombing

Read also: DIY watershed: one year on since gay friendly bar firebombed in Armenia capital Yerevan

*source: PINK Armenia

Exactly one year ago, on May 8th, 2012, three young men bombed DIY pub in Yerevan, which was
followed by scores of state officials justifying the hateful crime. In connection with this, on May 8, 2013 at 12:00 pm, Ani Plaza Hotel hosted “Hate Culture in Armenia: One Year Later”, a round-table discussion organized by concerned citizens with the support of Human Rights House – Yerevan.

The discussion began with activist Lala Aslikyan presenting a chronology of events that took place before and after the bombing. “DIY pub opened its doors in April of 2011 and was subject to frequent threats and attacks by groups of young fascists just a few months after its opening. Attackers would constantly destroy property, break bottles and glass, and spit on the premises,” said Lala. “At 5:00am on May 8th, 2012 five young men bombed the pub. A few days later, extremists graffitied the walls of the pub with images and symbols of fascism. Although the suspects were arrested, one suspect was bailed out shortly after and police released the other after he promised not to leave the country.”

Lusine Ghazaryan presented the legal process of the case, emphasizing that what happened was a hate crime because the act was aimed at destroying not only property, but to intimidate and threaten the owner of the pub as well as the safety of her supporters. “The criminals were charged under Article 185 of the criminal code, which does not include hate crimes,” said Lusine. Adding that this case might have great strategic importance, as it can bring significant positive changes in the law to include intent.

Mamikon Hovsepyan of PINK Armenia spoke about institutionalized homophobia and how every time there are elections, political parties draw attention to LGBT people and use homophobia as a means to gather an electorate since a majority of the population is homophobic. “They target specific people and last year after the parliamentary elections the target was Tsomak”, said Mamikon.

Human rights defender Arthur Sakunts noted, “the structure of the government is monopolized, which creates fertile ground for the emergence of different forms of discrimination to which religious organizations, LGBT individuals, women, ethnic minorities, foreign citizens and anyone else who is somehow different from the ruling majority are subject to. The solution to this problem is Article 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia which states that Armenia is a sovereign, democratic, social state governed by the rule of law”.

Round-table participant Yura Manvelyan, editor of Epress.am said, “The mass media has created an image of the enemy: Turks, Jehovah’s Witnesses, homosexuals, and feminist activists. The journalist is the only connection between the editor and the microphone. Therefore, the journalist has control of how they want to create the story and twist it around. Usually journalists perpetuate hate culture through their own stereotypes and prejudices.”

Sunday, 25 November 2012

Anti-discrimination legislation under discussion in Armenia amid discontent of local human rights groups with the Ombudsman office

On the occasion of the International Day of Tolerance, 16th November, PINK Armenia organised a round-table discussion aimed at developing and advocating for anti-discrimination legislation in the Republic of Armenia.
“Armenia has joined and/or ratified all the main international tools to eradicate discrimination. Nevertheless, the problem of discrimination has never been discussed consistently, and there are no effective legal mechanisms to prevent and punish discrimination against individuals. It is important to shape operational mechanisms in this context to prevent discrimination, intolerance and xenophobia, as well as to respond appropriately to such manifestations”, mentioned the head of PINK Mamikon Hovsepyan. (PINK Armenia press release)
Representatives of the Human Rights Defender (Ombudsman) Office informed that they have already prepared a preliminary draft of the anti-discrimination law while stating the necessity and importance of this legislation.

It was bizarre to learn that the Ombudsman’s office has already prepared or in a process of finalising a draft anti-discrimination legislation without consultations with the local NGOs working in the filed. This resulted in heated discussions at the round-table.

As far as I learned, Ombudsman’s office reassured that the draft anti-discrimination law will be inclusive (inclusive of sexual orientation too). However, until I see it, I won’t be certain that this is indeed a comprehensive law. Also, Ombudsman’s office should use the word “consultation” to its full meaning and not just a mere formality.

On the other hand, while welcoming these developments, I have doubts that with the current parliament such legislative initiatives have a chance to pass, unless they are set as precondition by the European Union and European organisations to further develop ties with Armenia.

Sunday, 15 July 2012

Armenia LGBT rights record to be scrutinised before UN Human Rights Committee

Review of Armenia at UN Human Rights Committee to begin on Monday 16 July 2012.

PINK Armenia in cooperation with the Heartland Alliance for Human Needs & Human Rights, ILGA-Europe and the George Washington University Law School International Human Rights Clinic has prepared and submitted a shadow report focusing on "Human Rights Violations of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) People in Armenia" for consideration at the 105th Session of the Human Rights Committee. (ILGA-Europe)

This is the first time such a comprehensive LGBT report has been submitted as part of the review of Armenia human rights commitments before the UN.

Human Rights House Network reports that the hearings of this and other Armenia related issues will take place on 16-17 July. You may follow live broadcast here: http://www.treatybodywebcast.org

To access LGBT Report in full - follow this link. Below are selected key summary extracts.

***

The purpose of this report is to highlight the widespread and systematic human rights violations experienced by lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) individuals in Armenia. These violations have become all the more concerning in light of the recent upsurge in violent attacks against the LGBT community, and speech inciting such attacks in the month of May 2012. In particular, the report draws the attention of the Committee to the following breaches of the Covenant:

Background summary
• The State of Armenia remains deeply oppressive toward LGBT individuals, as reflected by public officials’ statements against the LGBT community.
• The Armenian State fails to protect LGBT individuals from public stigma and hate speech because it has failed to enact laws that criminalize hate speech, including against LGBT persons.
• Individuals in Armenia are subject to discrimination on the basis of their sexual orientation and/or gender identity by both State and non-State actors, including in access to education, employment opportunities, and healthcare.
• Though inadequate reporting makes exact numbers uncertain, local human rights groups report an alarming number of non-combat deaths in the army each year, including deaths of LGBT individuals. Gay and bisexual men serving in the army may be particularly at risk. The Armenian State fails to adequately prevent, investigate, and/or prosecute incidents of gender and sexual orientation-based killings, including against LGBT individuals.
• Gay and bisexual men in Armenia suffer cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment while serving in the army or detained in prison. In some instances, the State is responsible for this abuse or fails to adequately prevent, investigate, and/or prosecute incidents of violence toward LGBT individuals.
• The Armenian State refuses to recognize the gender identity of transgender persons. By denying transgender individuals appropriate identity documents, the State withholds from them the status of legal personhood.

Recommendations
The State of Armenia must adopt legislative, administrative, and judicial measures to ensure respect, protection, and promotion of, and minimize violation of, human rights without any distinction based on an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity. To that end, the Human Rights Committee should recommend:

1. Armenia should adopt anti-discrimination legislation that condemns discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
2. Armenia should take appropriate measures to end all discrimination against individuals on the basis of their sexual orientation and gender identity by adopting comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation. In particular, the State party should introduce a comprehensive system of laws that criminalize hate speech and discourage statements by public officials that foster discrimination against LGBT people.
3. Armenia should take action to end all violence committed against individuals on the basis of their sexual orientation and/or gender identity in the Armenian army or who are detained in prison. In particular, the State party should protect LGBT persons from discrimination, physical and mental torture, and degrading treatment. The State party should revise the military code and put in place measures to fully investigate alleged crimes on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, and where appropriate, ensure that such crimes are properly prosecuted and punished.
4. Armenia should take appropriate measures to ensure that all persons have the enjoyment of their rights and are entitled to access basic services, such as education and employment, without discrimination on the basis of their sexual orientation and gender identity. In particular, the State Party should pay special attention to undertake these efforts outside of the capital city of Yerevan.
5. Armenia should take steps to improve its public health campaign to end discrimination against LGBT persons infected with HIV/AIDS.
6. Armenia should adopt appropriate laws that permit transgender persons to legally transition, and to receive identity documents that reflect an individual’s identified gender.

Question to the State party
1. What is the State party doing to address discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity?
2. What is the State party doing to address hate speech and homophobic statements by public officials, which are detrimental to the full exercise of the right to freedom of expression?
3. What is the State party doing to protect individuals from physical and mental torture, and degrading treatment on grounds of their real or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity, particularly in the Armenian army and among detainees?
4. What is the State party doing to legally recognize sex and name that reflect the individual’s gender identity in the case of transgender people?

Saturday, 26 May 2012

"Deliberate misinformation to disrupt Diversity March" (statement by organisers)

*picture by Global Chaos: "Although this is the reverse of the Nazi swastika, the message is clear".

[Read also: Neo-nazi attack Diversity march in Armenia capital Yerevan calling it "gay pride"]
***
Statement: Deliberate misinformation to disrupt Diversity March

[Armenian version]

On May the 21st, 4:15 PM, the Public Information and Need of Knowledge and Women’s Resource Center Armenia NGOs organized a Diversity March in central Yerevan. The march was organized within the scope of the World Day for Cultural Diversity, in order to demonstrate and value cultural, ethnic, human and fauna diversity in Armenia. They had prepared posters about ethnic, racial and fauna diversity, plurality, and cultural diversity. 

Before the march misinformation was spread on social networks, declaring that the event had a hidden motive: that, in fact, it was meant to be a gay-parade. In this regard extremist groups had gathered near M. Saryan’s statue, in order to subject the participants of the event to violence, under the pretext of “patriotism”.

Various NGOs, civic initiatives, representatives of international organizations, as well as refugees living in Armenia, people of various social backgrounds and civic activists were taking part in the event. Chanting fascist slogans, namely “zieg heil”, with threats, profanities, calls for violence and violent acts, the extremists did everything to obstruct the march, terrorizing the participants of the peaceful event. Even the presence of the RA Police did not prevent the aggressive and bigot masses from continuing their attacks and actions. In this situation the Police hardly ensured the security of the participants of the march.

We consider that criminal acts have taken place, namely, apparent propaganda of hate on the basis of discrimination which is forbidden under the RA Constitution, calls for violence and threats. We have numerous video-recordings and photographs, more can be find in the mass media. We demand that law-enforcement bodies find and call to responsibility the organizers and participants of the attacks.

Public Information and Need of Knowledge NGO
Women’s Resource Center Armenia NGO

Wednesday, 18 April 2012

American director Daniel Kramer at the Mariinsky Theatre speaks out against notorious homophobic law in St Petersburg

Via The Moscow Times: Mariinsky Stages Dark, Brooding Debussy Opera

[...] One thought that comes to mind after reading an interview with Kramer, published in the production's program, is that the theme of forbidden love is also political.

"Look at one of the laws that has just been passed in St. Petersburg," the director said, referring to the notorious bill banning "gay propaganda" that was passed by the St. Petersburg Legislative Assembly this spring.

"Does the human heart have rules? Who decides who we can and cannot love? Can anybody govern our hearts? The revolutions of the human heart are unstoppable in my experience," Kramer said.


*Thanks to M. for the link.

Friday, 6 April 2012

#госдеп2 - Russian TV programme by Ksenia Sobchak on motives of scandalous homophobic law in St Petersburg

Highly recommend watching #госдеп2 Russian TV programme with Ksenia Sobchak [Ксения Собчак] re homophobic law in St Petersburg. My personal favourite - among guests of the programme - was sexologist Sergei Agarkov. He did not speak much, but whatever he said was spot on. Armenian sexologists & co, especially the ones who became media 'stars', as of lately, should take a note of their colleague's answers.

And here is what journalist Olga Bakushinskaya said re motives of such laws and stirring up hatred and homophobia in Russian (and not only!) society: "... потому что людьми которые полны ненависти легче управлять" [...because it’s easier to rule over /manipulate with people who are full of hatred]. Quote of The Day, indeed.

More on this topic:

Gazeta.ru editorial: "Traditional orientation" (RU)

Must watch: Russian TV programme makes mockery of proposed anti-gay "propaganda" law in St Petersburg

How I ‘became’ gay. A very personal reflection ahead of return to Stalinism and Fascism in Russia

Tuesday, 27 March 2012

Georgia parliament approved anti-discriminatory amendment. Any crime motivated by sexual orientation - "aggravating circumstance"

Georgia made a significant step forward towards outlawing discrimination based on sexual orientation. Georgian parliament adopted in its final reading anti-discriminatory amendment that will consider any crime motivated by sexual orientation an "aggravating circumstance".

We need similar provisions for Armenia too. I wonder if the European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) made similar recommendations for Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey? If they have not made yet, well, they should. A comprehensive anti-discrimination provisions covering, along with criminal code, health care, employment, provision of services, education and so on, should be a MUST in a way of furthering integration with the EU.

For now, I may only re-instate what I mentioned in my previous related post: As of now, Georgia is clearly the most advanced country in the South Caucasus in terms of legislative provisions on LGBT issues. [Read more: Georgian Legislation on LGBT Issues - “Regional Network Against Homophobia” book chapter]

*Civil.ge reports

Parliament approved on March 27 with its third and final reading an amendment to the criminal code making the racial, religious, sexual orientation or other bias motives of an offender an aggravating circumstance to be taken into account by the courts.

Aggravating circumstances, according to amendment, will apply to any offense motivated by “race, colour, language, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion, political and other views, disability, citizenship, national origin, ethnicity, social identity, origin, property and other status, place of residence or other discriminatory grounds and intolerance.”

The amendments was made in response to recommendations from the European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI), a human rights body of the Council of Europe, which has been calling on Georgia to enact legislation providing for racist motivation to constitute a general aggravating circumstance applicable to all types of offenses.

The initial proposal was prepared at the Civic Integration and Tolerance Council at the President of Georgia, followed by broad discussions with civil society groups and stakeholders, including in the regions in cooperation with the Public Defender’s Council of National Minorities in frames of USAID project.

In the process of further discussions in the Parliament, upon the recommendations of civil society groups the draft was amended to include not only ethnic, racial or religious factors in the list of discriminatory grounds but also sexual orientation.

Monday, 26 March 2012

Anna Safaryan - Defender of Minorities Rights (Armenia Ombudsman Office)

*via Armenia Human Rights Defender (Ombudsman) website

Anna Safaryan
Leading Specialist of Vulnerable Groups Protection and Cooperation with Non-Governmental Organizations

Equality is touchstone of justice; jointly both of them make the essence of freedom.

97% of people living in our country according to census data are Armenians by nationality. All national minorities together form only 3% of the population. But Armenia is a motherland of all its citizens, and all of them have equal rights.

The exceptional mission of Armenian Apostolic Church in the spiritual lives of our people is recognized by the State. At the same time the Constitution of our country provides free space to other religious organizations’ activities. No one should be discriminated for his national identity, religion, or sexual orientation. This is the real expression of democracy, pluralism, equality and freedom, which is fixed in the Constitution and is protected by us.

Defender of Minorities’ Rights

/emphasis mine/

Sunday, 18 March 2012

Georgian Legislation on LGBT Issues - “Regional Network Against Homophobia” book chapter

As of now, Georgia is clearly the most advanced country in the South Caucasus in terms of legislative provisions on LGBT issues. (consider also the latest developments: Parliament of Georgia to adopt anti-discrimination amendment in the Criminal Code and Georgia is going to take the hatred towards LGBT into the scope of crime)

Ahead of the 2nd Regional Network Against Homophobia in Ankara, “Regional Network Against Homophobia” book with a separate chapter on Georgia has been published.

Below is Georgian Legislation on LGBT Issues chapter, via Kaos GL.
***

By Giorgi Gotsiridze
Georgian Young Lawyer’s Association
&
Tamta Melashvili
Diversity Research and Community Activism Association

Constitutional Guarantees
* Article 14 of Georgian Constitution prohibits discrimination on the basis of several grounds.
* The sexual orientation is not directly mentioned in the article. Unlike European convention on human rights, Georgian constitution gives exhaustive lists of the ground on which discrimination is prohibited.
* Constitutional Court of Georgia is the competent body to interpret Constitution. Court took broad interpretation of Article 14. The Court stated that discrimination was prohibited on the ground which might not be directly mentioned in Article 14.
* The court has not dealt with the case concerning the discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation.

Labor Rights
*Since the amendments were introduced in the Georgian Constitution on 15th of August 2010, Labor rights should have been regulated by the organic law. This is superior law than the ordinary one.
*Ordinary Labor Code introduced in 2006 was replaced by the organic labor code on 16th of December 2011.
* There has not been reflected any significant changes in the new code. The relevant provisions on the prohibition of discrimination have been kept.
* Article 2 of this code prohibits discrimination, inter alia, on the ground of sexual orientation
* Article 38 enables an employer to fire employee without invoking any reason. The motivation of the contract breaking could be the sexual orientation of the employee.
* If the employee fired were not afforded with the reasoning explanation, he or she would be unable to produce any reliable evidence to the court in order to prove that the employer had treated him//her in a discriminatory manner.

Prison
* A same-sex partner is entitled to have short-term visit with the person incarcerated. The short-term visit lasts from 1 to 2 hours. The meeting should be taken place by the visual control of the prison administration.
* While the draft amendments in the prison code were being discussed by Georgian parliament, the right to long term visits was declined for same-sex partner due to the plain homophobic approach.
* Long-term visit gives possibility for the prisoner to live in the separated compartment of the prison facility with his or her spouse for 3 days.

Right to Marriage
* Defining meaning of the marriage, Article 36 of Georgian Constitution does not mention that only opposite-sex couples could get married.
* However Civil Code of Georgia defines marriage as “relationship between a man and a women”.
* Georgian Constitution keeps the issue open whether the prohibition of same-sax marriage is constitutional.
* Georgian legislation does not guarantee for same-sex couples to enter into the registered partnership relationship.

Parental Rights
* A single member of the LGBT community is entitled to adopt a child
* A single women, including lesbians, can use artificial insemination and be recognized as a parent of the child given a birth through the artificial insemination.
* Couples, not being necessary to be the spouses, are entitled to use extracorporeal fertilization in order to have their own children.

Prohibition on Blood Donation
* Order of the Minister for Labor, Social and Health Protection prohibits risk groups of HIV/AIDS from being a blood donor.
* Homosexuals are directly listed as the risk groups of HIV/AIDS. LGBT people are clearly stigmatized as homosexuality in itself has been exposed to be the risk factor as a cause of HIV/AIDS.

Right to Change Identity
* Transgenders are entitled to change their first names, family names and paternal names after their gender have been reassigned resulting from surgeon intervention.
* However transgenders who have not been reassigned their gender yet are entitled to change only their first names.

Hate Crimes
* Criminal Code of Georgia considers hate crimes as an aggravated circumstances of a particular crime. The racial, religious and ethnic hatred are the motives which are punishable under criminal code of Georgia. Homophobia as a possible motive of particular crime has been excluded from the list of hate crimes.
* A criminal who kills a person because of the victim’s ethnic origin, should be punished from 13 to 17 years of incarceration, while the killing motivated by the victim’s sexual orientation should be punished only from 7 to 14 years of incarceration.

Hate Speech
* There is no criminalization of hate speech in Georgian Penal Code; however, it is regulated by the law on broadcasting. Under the Article 56.3, any television or radio station should avoid broadcasting programs that stir up hatred, discrimination or the offensive content to any person or group on the basis sexual orientation.
* The complaints on the alleged homophobic programs should be addressed by the internal review mechanism of the broadcasting company concerned.
* The courts as well as National Communication Commission are prohibited from considering complaints on alleged homophobic sentiments in media.